Did you know? · Philosophy & Thought

David Ricardo admitted machines could hurt workers

In 1821 David Ricardo added a chapter “On Machinery” to his Principles, openly changing his mind and accepting that machines could harm workers’ interests.

David Ricardo
David Ricardo · 1772–1823
Person
David Ricardo
Lived
1772–1823
Field
Economics and finance
From
British

The story

In the early nineteenth century new machines were spreading through British workshops and mills, and many workers believed that machinery threatened their livelihoods. David Ricardo, whose Principles of Political Economy and Taxation had appeared in 1817, had earlier taken a more optimistic view, but he kept thinking about the question.

The Principles sold well after an enthusiastic review by John Ramsay McCulloch in the Edinburgh Review in 1818, and a second edition followed in 1819. For the third edition, published in May 1821, Ricardo made extensive changes, especially to the opening chapter on value, and added an entirely new chapter, "On Machinery". Machinery was already on his mind: his chapter on value stated that the principle by which labour regulated value was considerably modified by the use of machinery and other durable capital.

In it he candidly declared that he had changed his mind. He wrote that he had become convinced that substituting machinery for human labour is often very injurious to the interests of labourers, and that their opinion was not founded on prejudice and error but was in line with the correct principles of political economy. He now accepted that introducing machinery could create unemployment and could even reduce the gross produce of a country while increasing its net produce, in which case some workers would be thrown out of work and the labouring classes would suffer.

McCulloch, who had become one of the most energetic promoters of Ricardo's ideas, was scandalised by the reversal. Ricardo, though, did not abandon his belief in progress or free trade. But he now insisted that the short-term costs to workers were real and deserved to be taken seriously.

The chapter has had a long afterlife. Economists continue to debate how new technology affects jobs and wages, and Ricardo's argument is now formulated in modern terms. His willingness to revise a published position in the light of better reasoning is often cited as a model of intellectual honesty.

Why it matters

Ricardo's willingness to take workers' concerns seriously, and to change his mind publicly, set an example of intellectual honesty that economists still discuss as automation reshapes work today.

About David Ricardo

Sephardic stockbroker’s son who made a fortune in the City, then founded classical economics, the theory of comparative advantage, rent and money behind the case for free trade.

Read the full profile
David Ricardo
1772–1823 · Economics and finance
View profile →

More about David Ricardo

Sources

Another act of tikkun olam. This is part of tikkun olam, the Jewish idea of repairing the world, and every one of us can add to it.

More in Philosophy & Thought

On kindness & the treatment of others
“A friend is devoted at all times; a brother is born to share adversity.”
Proverbs 17:17